CW / 7829 / 2024 (TWINKLE SINGH VS THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: 03/03/2025 Pet. aggrieved by the notice issued by Registrar (Exam.) requiring them to appear in the Efficiency Test for promotion to the post of Personal Asstt./Judgment Writer. HELD: Chance to get selected under 25% vacancy on the basis of the Efficiency Test shall be extended to others who were appointed in the same financial year with pet. The Jnr. Personal Asstt. appointed in 2020 or after cannot seek promotion with batch 2016 against the vacancies that occurred prior to 2nd Mar 2020. Petition allowed.
2
SAW / 266 / 2020 (LT. COL. EKLAVYA TAK VS UNION OF INDIA) Date of Order/Judgment: 28/02/2025 Appellant challenged denial of Permanent Commission in Army Dental Corps (AD Corps) under Policy of 1996, which assessed eligibility via three departmental exams HELD: Policy of 1996, prescribing exam-based assessment without considering ACRs, is valid. Appellant participated thrice (2008, 2009, 2011) without protest; now estopped from challenging criteria. Policy of 2012 (considering ACRs) inapplicable to AD Corps. Judicial Review limited to legality, not wisdom, of policy. Appeal Dismissed.
3
SAW / 1422 / 2014 (AJMER VIDHYUT VITARAN NIGAM LTD. AND ORS. VS MUKESH KUMAR BERWA) Date of Order/Judgment: 28/02/2025 Appellants challenged order directing consideration of respondent’s compassionate appointment post father’s death 17.02.11 HELD Notification dated 24.02.11 barring applicants with >2 children cannot apply retrospectively. No policy was in existence on the date of death nor anything was mentioned which barred respondent’s candidature. Law prevailing on the date of death to be strictly applied. Rejection of candidature would violate the objective to reduce financial distress. Appeal dismissed.
4
CW / 3470 / 2025 (MOOLA RAM VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: 18/02/2025 Petitioner challenged the notification creating a new revenue village "Gogaji Ki Jaal," alleging violation of Clause 4 of the Circular dated 20.08.2009. HELD: Naming villages after a person, caste, sub-caste or religion is impermissible. These restrictions, have been imposed keeping in mind the ethos of democracy and larger public interest. Notification dated 20.01.25 is in violation of clause 4 of circular dated 20.08.09; hence quashed. Petition allowed.
5
CRLMP / 7213 / 2022 (ABDUL SATTAR VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: 06/02/2025 Petitioner sought quashing of FIR under Section 17(4) of the Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970, and Section 15(2) of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, alleging illegal medical practice. HELD: Offences are non-cognizable and bailable; FIR registered without prior approval from Magistrate violates Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Violation of principles of natural justice as FIR was lodged without affording the petitioner an opportunity of being heard. Petition allowed.
1
CW / 15451 / 2024 (DR. SABYASACHI SWAIN SON OF SHRI UPENDRANATH SWAIN VS MALVIYA NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY) Date of Order/Judgment: 05/03/2025 Petitioner assailing the order issued by the resp. No. 1, cancelling the appointment of the petitioner on the post of Asstt. Professor Grade-II. HELD: The petitioner did not possess the requisite qualification on the last date of submission of application form. Granting any relief to the petitioner would violate the doctrine of equality guaranteed under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India, which is the backbone of the Fundamental Rights. Petition rejected.
2
CW / 19162 / 2022 (R.G. MEENA SON OF LATE SHRI SUALAL MEENA VS UNION OF INDIA) Date of Order/Judgment: 04/03/2025 Petitioner aggrieved of order passed by Central Administrative Tribunal, Jaipur. HELD: The Tribunal while passing the impugned order has not taken into account the facts regarding date of promotion of the petitioner viz-a-viz the respondent No.5 for determining the seniority in 2013.The Tribunal misconstrued that the petitioner was aggrieved of the promotion of the respondent No.5 and erred in relying on the decision of the Chandigarh Bench of the Tribunal. Petition allowed.
3
CW / 27597 / 2018 (BHAVAL SYNTHETICS (INDIA) LTD. VS THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (ACIT)) Date of Order/Judgment: 04/03/2025 Petitioner seeks quashing of notice issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, rejecting objections filed by the petitioner. HELD: While dealing with the objections the finding recorded is that the assessing officer had come to the conclusion that on failure to fully and truly disclose the necessary material, there is an escapement of assessment. The AO had reasons to believe that there was escapement MAT. The escapement was a result of non-disclosure by the petitioner. Petition dismissed.
4
CW / 16622 / 2023 (SHRI RAKESH MATHUR VS SMT. ANJULAI SONI WIFE OF SHRI VIJAY SONI) Date of Order/Judgment: 03/03/2025 Petitioners & private respondents assailing the order passed by Central Appellate Tribunal. HELD: The applicants succeeded in getting high pay scale only on ground of their juniors having got it, as the tribunal considered that the revised pay scale was granted to the persons regularized in the year 2000 but it was granted only to the persons who approached the tribunal whereas the policy should have been implemented uniformly to all similarly situated persons. Petition disposed of.
5
CW / 9387 / 2015 (M/S MAHESHWARI FILLING VS STATE OF RAJ AND ANR) Date of Order/Judgment: 25/02/2025 Whether the lease deed was executed only for a period of fifteen years for monthly rent of Rs.7500/-. HELD: There is automatic renewal and that to without any act of the parties i.e. there is no need for fresh lease deed. The T&C are to remain same, including the renewal clause. The lessor has no option for not renewing the lease. On reading of lease deed as a whole the picture emerges that for renewal no act is to be done and lease deed is for more than 20 years. Petition dismissed.
