WCP / 732 / 2017 (M/S.ALOK CHITRA MANDIR, CHURU VS HEMANT JAIN) Date of Order/Judgment: 06/01/2025 Contempt Petition preferred alleging disobedience of the judgment passed by this court allowing the writ petition. HELD: Despite the recorded findings, the Dep. Comm. proceeded on to affirm the same order which is contemptuous. Purpose of contempt juris. is to uphold dignity of the Courts of law. However, the disobedience might be because of lack of understanding, taking a liberal view, and deems it appropriate to grant a chance to the resp. to rectify the order.
2
CFA / 215 / 2023 (SUNIL VS OSTWAL PHOSCHEM (INDIA) LTD) Date of Order/Judgment: 06/01/2025 Appeal preferred against order passed by the ADJ No.3, Bhilwara, allowing the application under Order 7 Rule 11, CPC. HELD: The main relief as prayed for in the suit in question is for declaration of Khatedari rights and the relief for cancellation of sale deed is an ancillary relief. The finding as recorded by learned Trial Court is totally in consonance with law and does not deserve any interference. The order impugned does not deserve any interference. Appeal dismissed.
3
CW / 16307 / 2024 (SHAMBOO SINGH VS THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: 12/12/2024 Petitioner assailing the order issued by Distt. Education Officer placing the petitioner under suspension. HELD: Petitioner’s unruly behaviour cannot be tolerated in the name of freedom of expression. Petitioner’s engagement in political activities and his behaviour definitely falls within the scope of misconduct. The petitioner cannot use freedom to garner his fiefdom. To keep the society in order, self-restraint is necessary while respecting self-esteem of others. Petition dismissed
4
SAW / 1057 / 2024 (UNION OF INDIA VS JIET MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL) Date of Order/Judgment: 11/12/2024 Appellant appealed against the order passed by the ld. Single Judge allowing the increase of the seats in medical college. HELD:Interim order ought not to have been granted, not inclined to set aside the interim order, since students have paid their fee, admitted, joined & competed about a month of study, but direct the parties to complete their pleadings within 10 days & request the ld Judge to hear the petition within 1 month from the date of completion of pleadings. Appeal disposed
5
CW / 19773 / 2024 (SMT. KAMLA DEVI VS THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: 05/12/2024 Whether a daughter of a govt. servant, who becomes a widow/divorcee is entitled to family pension under Rules 66 & 67 of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1996? HELD: Pet. father died on 20.9.2017 & husband subsequently on 20.2.2023. Age of pet. at the time of filing app. was 73 years. She cannot claim that she was dependant on her father for 40 yrs. Circular being completely contrary to the scheme of rules cannot be given any credence. Petition dismissed.
6
HC / 467 / 2024 (GORKHA RAM VS THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: 04/12/2024 Petitioner seeks direction upon the state authorities for production of ‘X’ in the Court; aged about 32 years. HELD: No fundamental right of a person to have a live-in relationship with a woman legally married to another man and, more particularly woman when his own sister. The live-in relationship allegedly entered into between the pet. and ‘X’ is void ab initio. Writ court cannot excercise its discretionary powers as the matter would only sanctify immorality in society. Petition dismissed.
1
CW / 19781 / 2024 (SUO MOTU - IN THE MATTER OF MASSIVE FIRE BROKE OUT VS UNION OF INDIA) Date of Order/Judgment: 21/12/2024 Court took suo moto cognizance on massive fire break out at Jaipur-Ajmer Highway due to collision of truck & LPG Tanker. HELD: These accidents result in huge loss of human kind and economy. Steps on the part of the Govt. are not sufficient; appropriate amount of compensation to be paid to deceased & all victims. Delay in completion of roads construction works cause huge difficulties. Issue notice to the resp. as to why the mentioned directions be not issued to them.
2
CRLMP / 8225 / 2024 (HEERA LAL S/O KISHNARAM, VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: 10/12/2024 Whether order of framing of charge is interlocutory or final in nature? & which court should be approached High Court or Court of Session? Held: Orders framing charges or refusing discharge are neither interlocutory nor final in nature and are not affected by the bar of S. 397(2) CrPC. And, when the 2 forums are available, then it is a matter of propriety for the party to first approach the lower forum (Sessions court), except in rare and special circumstances. Petition dismissed.
3
CW / 14894 / 2024 (M/S BABA MINERALS VS UNION OF INDIA) Date of Order/Judgment: 22/11/2024 Petitioner seeks quashing of show cause notice. HELD: The challenge in the present petition is only to the show cause notice. The allegations against the petitioner in the show cause notice are based upon the facts and needs factual determination. The petitioner has filed this petition even without filing the reply to the show cause notice. For determining the contention that DGGSTI cannot be adjudicating authority the writ is premature and is dismissed accordingly.
4
SAW / 493 / 2024 (RAJASTHAN VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED VS SOMI CONVEYORS BELTINGS LIMITED) Date of Order/Judgment: 19/11/2024 Appeal preferred against the interim order passed by the ld. Vacation Judge, passing an exparte interim order restraining appellants to issue work order to Resp. no. 2. HELD: An application for vacating stay ought to be decided as soon as it was filed. Continuing interim order without hearing application & keeping the matter pending amounts to allowing the petition. Delay in procurement of conveyor belt by 6 months affected electricity production. Appeal partly allowed.
5
CW / 4354 / 2023 (KRIYA VIKRAYA SAHAKARI SAMITI LIMITED VS THE INCOME TAX OFFICER) Date of Order/Judgment: 19/11/2024 Petitioner seeks quashing of assessment order passed for assessment year 2020-21. HELD: The assessment order passed is in violation of principle of natural justice. Exceptional case is carved out for interfering in the writ jurisdiction inspite of statutory remedy of appeal. The impugned assessment order is set aside, the assessing office shall proceed with the SCN dated 29.06.2021 in accordance with law and after providing an opportunity to file the reply. Petition is allowed.
