| 1 |
CW / 807 / 2012 (SARDAR MAL YADAV VS STATE ELEMENTARY EDUCATIONORS) Date of Order/Judgment: 07/02/2025
Petitioner challenged the delay in concluding departmental inquiry initiated in 2011. HELD: Inquiry was completed in 2014, but no final order was passed, violating Rajasthan Civil Services Rules 1958. Authorities must ensure timely completion of inquiries within six months. In case of lack of proper assistance officer-in-charge shall be made liable for strict disciplinary action. Chief Secretary directed to submit an affidavit on systemic improvements. Matter listed on 10.03.25. |
| 2 |
CW / 1496 / 2009 (SATTAR KHAN VS ZILA PARISHAD DAUSHA AND ANR) Date of Order/Judgment: 05/02/2025
Petitioner challenged termination from contractual employment under NREGA, claiming OBC status as a Muslim-Teli. HELD: Official notifications confirm Teli caste, irrespective of religion, falls under OBC. Notification dated 28.08.2009 includes all the persons who are ‘Teli’ by hereditary occupations irrespective of their religion. General mandamus issued to ensure OBC benefits are not denied to eligible Muslim candidates. Petition allowed. |
| 3 |
CRLA / 38 / 2016 (BHAGWAN SINGH VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGH PP) Date of Order/Judgment: 24/01/2025
Appellant assailing the judgment passed by the Special Court of ACD Cases, Alwar, convicting him u/s 7 & 13(2) rw S. 13(1) (d) Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. HELD: Accused convicted merely on the basis of alleged recovery of certain currency notes, without there being any cogent evidence as regards the demands and acceptance. In absence of such evidence, conviction and sentence cannot be said to be justified. Appeal allowed. |
| 4 |
CW / 1311 / 2025 (SUO MOTU- IN THE MATTER OF TACKLING THE ISSUE OF DIGITAL ARREST SCAMS VS UNION OF INDIA) Date of Order/Judgment: 22/01/2025
Court takes suo moto cognizance due to increasing of offences like cyber crimes and digital arrests in the society. Many innocent people have been trapped and lost huge amount of hard-earned money. RBI & Government is required to develop a mechanism of stoppage of payment to fraudulent persons where complaint is lodged. Chief Secretary Government of Rajasthan & Secretary MHA directed to submit report regarding steps taken to curb such situations. |
| 5 |
CRLMP / 1674 / 2019 (RASHMI KHANDELWAL D/O SHRI PRAMOD KHANDELWAL, W/O SHRI RAJENDRA SINGH SHARMA B/C KHANDELWAL VAISHYA VS GANESH KUMAR S/O SHRI BALDEV SINGH B/C JATAV) Date of Order/Judgment: 16/01/2025
Whether the amended provision contained u/s 143A of the NI Act, 1881 would apply on the complaint filed prior to enactment and enforcement of this provision? HELD: Section 143A of the Act of 1881 has its prospective effect and the same is applicable upon the complaints filed under section 138 NI Act after insertion of Sec. 143A of the Act. i.e. after 01.09.2018. This provision cannot have its retrospective effect upon the complaints filed prior to 01.09.2018. Petitions allowed. |
| 6 |
CW / 15018 / 2024 (DR. RACHITA MATHUR WIFE OF DR. RISHABH BHARGAWA VS THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: 10/01/2025
Pet. seeks to declare clause “Selection Procedure” under the head of “Other Details” as unconstitutional. HELD: Raj. Medical Service (Collegiate Branch) Rules,1962 regulate the conditions of recruitment for the Raj. Medical Services & the same are enforced & amended under consent of Governor. It is made unambiguous that the amendment to the Rules of 1962 shall have a retrospective effect. 10% weightage to the interview be applicable qua the selection process. Petition allowed. |
| 7 |
CRLMP / 4342 / 2024 (NARENDRA KUMAR SONI SON OF NAVRANG PRASAD, VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: 07/01/2025
Petitioner assailing the order passed by Special Judge, Prevention of Corruption Act, Kota, rejecting the application partly u/s 91 CrPC HELD: Principles of natural justice are integral part of fair trial under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The denial of an adequate opportunity to the accused by non-production of the electronic record, which is admissible u/s 65-A & 65-B IEA, would amount to miscarriage of justice. Petition partly allowed. |
| 8 |
CRLA / 516 / 1991 (SHANKER LAL S/O BALU RAM VS STATE OF) Date of Order/Judgment: 29/11/2024
Appellant assailing the judgment passed by Special Judge, Prevention of Corruption Cases, Jaipur, convicting the appellant u/s 161 IPC & u/s 5(1)(d) r.w. S. 5(2) Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947. HELD: Statement of the witnesses & exhibited docs not signed by the presiding officers. Non compliance of provision of S. 313 CrPC would not ipso facto vitiate the trial unless material prejudice is shown to have been caused to accused. Trial took 5 years & appeal 34 years. Appeal allowed. |
| 9 |
SAW / 781 / 2023 (STATE OF RAJASTHAN VS SUKHENDRA PRASAD S/O SHRI JAGDISH PRASAD) Date of Order/Judgment: 16/07/2024
Appellant (State) assailing the order passed by the ld. Single Judge in the petition filed by the resp. HELD: Literal reading of the order reveals that it was intended to open avenues of further higher education to those who had passed certain courses but had not passed Senior Sec. Examination. Therefore, it is not a case of clarification at all but a subsequent decision taken by the Govt. to draw equivalence for a limited purpose but certainly not for the recruitment purpose.Petition dismissed |
