EP / 3 / 2024 (AMIT VS SHRI GANESH RAJ BANSAL) Date of Order/Judgment: 29/04/2025 The petitioner seeks to annul the respondent’s election, claiming improper nomination acceptance and non-disclosure of criminal cases, alleging corrupt practices. HELD-The court held that the petitioner failed to provide sufficient details about the criminal cases and alleged corrupt practices. The election petition was vague and lacked specifics. The court emphasized the need for compliance with statutory requirements. The petition was dismissed, and the election upheld.
2
CRLR / 1300 / 2023 (KAPIL RAM @ KAPIL RAM SINGHANI VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: 24/04/2025 Pet. challenged order framing charges u/s 306, 500, 501 & 504 IPC in a case alleging harassment of deceased via WhatsApp leading to suicide. HELD The core element of S. 306 is intentional abetment of suicide. No suicide note/direct evidence linked Pet. to abetment. Witnesses denied his involvement; WhatsApp messages were unsubstantiated. Allegations of harassment w/o any evidence don’t constitute abetment. Defamation & intentional insult charges remained unsustainable. Petition allowed
3
CRLR / 95 / 2025 (MITHU SINGH VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: 23/04/2025 Petitioner assailing the order passed by ld. Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities Cases), Chittorgarh, dismissing the application u/s 197(2) Cr.P.C. HELD: Pet. was not acting in the course of his official duties at the time of the alleged incident. The petitioner cannot invoke the protections of Sec. 197 Cr.P.C. solely by virtue of being a government employee, as the allegations made by the complainant are unrelated to the performance of his official duties. Petition dismissed.
4
SAW / 566 / 2024 (ECOSAFE INFRAPROJECTS LLP VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: 22/04/2025 The appellant seeks quashing of the e-auction notice, alleging that its terms and conditions, particularly regarding lease commencement and sale price fixation, are vague, ambiguous, uncertain, and non-transparent. HELD- The Court held that the appellant’s doubts were unfounded and imaginary, as the rules governing the mining lease process were clear. The conditions in the e-auction notice were consistent with the Rules, and no ambiguity existed. The appeal, being sans substratum, was dismissed.
5
SAW / 1262 / 2024 (ANKITA MATHUR VS THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: 21/04/2025 Appellant challenged sanction order for prosecution alleging mechanical approval without application of mind. HELD: Sanction upheld as authority examined demand, acceptance, and recovery evidence, including call transcripts. Sanctioning authority has applied its mind to come to the conclusion that it is a fit case for grant of sanction. Judicial review limited to examining the correctness and validity of the order of sanction, not merits of evidence. Appeal dismissed.
1
CW / 840 / 2025 (UMAKANT SHARMA SON OF LATE SHRI HARBAKSH LAL VS OM PRAKASH SHARMA SON OF SHRI HARBAKSH LAL) Date of Order/Judgment: 27/05/2025 The petitioner sought quashing of the impugned orders and requested the matter be sent back to the Trial Court for a fresh decision after properly framing issues and recording evidence as per CPC. HELD- the Court held that non-framing of issues u/O 14 CPC is a grave procedural error. Such failure violates mandatory legal duties of the court. It quashed all lower court decisions and remanded for a fresh trial after proper framing of issues, recording of evidence & training of revenue officer.
2
CMA / 5151 / 2019 (RAJASTHAN URBAN INFRASTRUCTURES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT VS M/S NATIONAL BUILDERS) Date of Order/Judgment: 01/05/2025 The appellant RUIDP challenged the arbitral award, claiming deductions, penalties, and damages were not proper and should have been reversed. HELD- the Court held that arbitral awards can't be interfered with unless there is a serious illegality going to the root of the matter. It stated that an award should not be disturbed merely because another view is possible. The Court found no such flaw or patent illegality in the award and upheld the arbitrator's findings.
3
CW / 5051 / 2025 (ABHA JAIN W/O SH. ASHOK KUMAR JAIN VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: 30/04/2025 Petitioner challenged the penalty orders and closing of mining activity alleging violation of principles natural justice. HELD: Site inspection report dated 16.01.2024 was not supplied with show cause notice; impugned orders lacked reasoning & are silent on the applicability of conversion factor post 2017 Rules which have removed the conversion factor in royalty Schedule. Matter remitted for fresh decision. No coercive action for six weeks. Petition disposed of.
4
CW / 5235 / 2025 (MANJEET DEORA D/O BHAWANI SINGH DEORA VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: 29/04/2025 Pet. challenged scholarship denial under E1 category despite selection, citing legitimate expectation. HELD: Less income was shown in ITRs i.e. ₹6.96 lakh while the CA assessed ₹11.32 lakh, disqualifying E1 eligibility. Neither promise nor representation was made by the state; admission to foreign university was at petitioner’s risk. Petition dismissed. Respondents restrained from granting E3 scholarships till further orders & directed to submit the list of all E1–E3 beneficiaries.
5
CRLR / 1918 / 2018 (MURARILAL S/O SHRI RAM SINGH B/C BRAHMIN VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: 28/04/2025 The petitioner wants the court to cancel the order that wrongly declared Deepak and Kapil as juveniles under an old law, and requests a fresh decision under the JJ Act, 2015. HELD- Court held that the trial court wrongly relied on the repealed JJ Act, 2000, instead of the applicable JJ Act, 2015. It stressed that age must be determined per Sec 94. The court found the process illegal, set aside the order, allowed the revision,& remitted the case for fresh decision
