CRLMB / 7940 / 2025 (ADNAN HAIDAR BHAI VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: 27/11/2025 Applicants seek bail in a digital-arrest fraud case. HELD-prima facie evidence showed accused’s involvement in an organized cyber-extortion network and custodial safeguards were needed, bail was rejected. Court found that IOs are not expert in technology. Various directions issued for handling these types of crimes to ACS Homes, DGP, D.G, SCRB & Cyber, Banks & Financial Institution & other Companies & Department etc..
2
CW / 4005 / 2006 (PRADHUMAN SINGH VS STATE AND ORS.) Date of Order/Judgment: 21/11/2025 Petitioner seeks quashing of the penalty of withholding two increments, alleging illegal inquiry and violation of natural justice. HELD-the inquiry was lawful, evidence showed negligence, punishment was proportionate, and writ review cannot reassess findings absent perversity or procedural illegality; no interference was warranted and the petition was dismissed. The Court noted that criminal and departmental standards differ and Article 226 permits limited supervisory review.
3
CW / 13775 / 2024 (NOPARAM VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: 13/11/2025 Peti. seeks quashing of the order disqualifying him from the post of Chairman, contending that alleged ineligibility u/ Sec 28(10) of the Rajasthan Cooperative Societies Act, 2001 could not be examined u/Sec 28(13). HELD—that the alleged disqualification was a pre-election issue and not a case of a member having become disqualified after election. The Registrar lacked jurisdiction under Section 28(13), such disputes lie under Section 58. The impugned order was therefore set aside.
4
CRLMB / 11482 / 2025 (SANDEEP SINGH ALIAS SONU VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: 14/10/2025 Applicant seeks waiver of the Registry’s objection requiring impleadment of the victim in the POCSO bail application, asserting that no provision mandates adding the victim or guardian as a party. HELD- the Court held that the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 does not require impleadment, but Sections 39–40 and Rule 4 mandate informing them of proceedings and securing their right to be heard; the objection is waived and the application allowed.
5
CW / 10763 / 2025 (GLOBAL PHARMACY COLLEGE VS THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: 14/10/2025 Petitioner seeks quashing of ban on NOCs and issuance of NOC for B.Pharmacy. HELD- that the State lacks legislative competence under the Pharmacy Act, 1948 to impose a blanket prohibition through executive instructions, that such action infringes Articles 14 and 19(1)(g), disregards the regulatory primacy of the PCI, and is discriminatory in confining the ban to private colleges as it fails the test of reasonableness. The order was set aside and the writ petition allowed.
1
ARBAP / 64 / 2024 (SOHAN BAI W/O LATE SHRI KRISHAN KUMAR NAGAR VS UNION OF INDIA) Date of Order/Judgment: 07/11/2025 Applicant seeks appointment of an independent arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 due to inaction of the respondents. HELD-that on filing of a Section 11(6) application, the respondent forfeits its contractual right to appoint an arbitrator. Any subsequent appointment is void and without jurisdiction, warranting court intervention, and accordingly an independent arbitrator was appointed by the Court. The application was accordingly allowed.
2
CW / 12831 / 2025 (JAGDISH PRASAD SHARMA S/O SH. RAMLAL VS JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) Date of Order/Judgment: 04/11/2025 Petitioner seeks quashing of the JDA notice under Sections 32 and 34A of the JDA Act, the sealing of his marriage garden, and the Tribunal’s affirming order. HELD-that orders of the JDA Tribunal lie only under Article 227, making a writ under Article 226 not maintainable. It further found that Section 17 of the JDA Act mandates prior development permission, which was absent, the sealing was lawful, and the petition was dismissed. JMC license cannot override required JDA permissions.
3
CRLMP / 3958 / 2025 (SWAPAN KUMAR S/O LATE SHRI BIJAN KUMAR RAI, VS THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: 04/11/2025 Petitioner seeks quashing of the prosecution sanction under Section 528 BNSS, alleging it was mechanically issued without application of mind or evaluation of material required by Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. HELD-that sanction defects matter only if they cause failure of justice. Validity was tested at trial, no prejudice was shown, trial had advanced, and any pre-trial interference would defeat the statute’s object, so the petition was dismissed.
4
CRLMP / 89 / 2019 (ANUJ SHARMA S/O SHRI D.D. SHARMA B/C BRAHMIN VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: 03/11/2025 Petitioner seeks quashing of cognizance for offence under Section 497 IPC. HELD- the Court held that once Section 497 IPC was struck down as unconstitutional, it became void from inception and the declaration operates retrospectively on pending case, continuation of prosecution would amount to abuse of process. Accordingly, the cognizance order, revisional order and all proceedings arising from the FIR were quashed.
5
CW / 14072 / 2025 (JAI SINGH SON OF RAM SINGH VS RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT) Date of Order/Judgment: 31/10/2025 Petitioners seek eligibility for promotion under Clause 4-A of the 2002 Rules. HELD-that Clause 4-A is grade-based, but ACP gives only financial up gradation and no functional promotion or Level-8 status, and that a probationer without confirmation cannot claim eligibility, lacking actual promotion and required status, petitioners were held ineligible and the writ petition was dismissed. Substantive appointment to feeder post is required and pay-level parity cannot confer eligibility.
