| 1 |
CRLMP / 6829 / 2025 (STATE OF RAJASTHAN VS BHAWANI SINGH RAJAWAT S/O KISHORE SINGH) Date of Order/Judgment: 04/12/2025
The State sought leave to withdraw prosecutions pending against sitting and former MLAs under Section 321 CrPC, arising from FIRs relating to peaceful public protests. HELD- that withdrawal requires High Court leave and must subserve public interest. Finding that the agitations were peaceful, offences were petty, and no disturbance of public order was alleged, the Court granted leave to the State to move applications for withdrawal before the Trial Court. The petitions were allowed. |
| 2 |
CRLW / 1134 / 2025 (KAPTAN SINGH S/O SHRI AMAR SINGH VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: 04/12/2025
The petitioner sought quashing of the order opening a history sheet under Rule 4.9 of the Rajasthan Police Rules, 1965. HELD- that a history sheet can be opened only against a habitual offender on reasoned satisfaction. With only one conviction and other cases ending in acquittal or quashing, the petitioner could not be treated as a habitual offender. The action was arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21. The order was quashed, the petition allowed, and applications disposed of. |
| 3 |
CRLMP / 1962 / 2010 (DR VINAY SUREN VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR) Date of Order/Judgment: 29/10/2025
Pet. sought quashing of FIR u/s 304-A & 420 IPC alleging medical negligence causing death of a newborn. FIR was initially closed by negative final report but later charge-sheet filed after further investigation based on expert medical opinions. HELD: Further investigation u/s 173(8) Cr.P.C. was lawful. Medical Board reports indicated negligence & misrepresentation of expertise. No illegality in cognizance/framing of charges. Petition dismissed. |
| 4 |
CSA / 177 / 2025 (RITESH KHATRI S/O SHYAM SUNDAR KHATRI VS SHYAM SUNDAR KHATRI S/O BALMUKUND KHATRI) Date of Order/Judgment: 28/10/2025
Son challenged concurrent decrees directing him to vacate a portion of his father’s self-acquired house, contending HUF ownership and absence of licensor–licensee relationship. HELD: Property was self-acquired; HUF plea not proved. Son’s possession was permissive/gratuitous and revocable. Suit for mandatory injunction was maintainable. No substantial question of law arose u/s 100 CPC. Second appeal dismissed with exemplary costs of ₹1,00,000. |
| 5 |
CRLMB / 5094 / 2025 (HITANSHU SANKHLA S/O SH. DIVAKAR SANKHLA VS UNION OF INDIA (CENTRAL NARCOTICS BUREAU)) Date of Order/Judgment: 28/10/2025
Applicant sought bail u/s 483 BNSS in an NDPS case involving recovery of 0.31 grams LSD on blotter papers and 6.1 grams ganja from a hostel room. HELD: Blotter paper forms an integral part of LSD; combined weight determines quantity. Recovery constituted commercial quantity attracting Section 37 NDPS Act. Mandatory conditions for bail not satisfied. Bail application dismissed. |
| 6 |
CW / 15081 / 2025 (SUDHA MEDICAL COLLEGE VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: 16/10/2025
Petitioner medical college sought direction to RUHS to grant fresh Consent of Affiliation (CoA) for increase of MBBS seats from 100 to 150 for A.Y. 2025–26. Request was denied citing lapse of affiliation calendar & absence of fresh CoA. HELD: Objection of alternate remedy is not tenable. RUHS had already issued CoA for 150 seats & clarified its three-year validity; denial on technical grounds was arbitrary. No delay or concealment of material fact attributable to Pet.; Writ allowed. |
| 7 |
CW / 13716 / 2025 (DR. MRS. VINOD KUMARI SANGWAN W/O SHRI MANVIR SINGH SANGWAN VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: 16/10/2025
Petitioner, an elected Pradhan, challenged her suspension, charge-sheet & preliminary enquiry arising from allegations of obstructing & assaulting a public servant. HELD: Preliminary enquiry was valid; sufficient opportunity of hearing was granted. Issuance of charge-sheet initiated enquiry under Section 38(1) of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 justifying suspension under Section 38(4). Suspension order recorded reasons and was not arbitrary. Writ petition dismissed. |
| 8 |
CRLA / 519 / 1996 (STATE VS KAILASH AND ORS.) Date of Order/Judgment: 08/10/2025
State appealed against acquittal in a murder case arising from FIR No.53/1987. HELD: Prosecution evidence suffered from major contradictions regarding place of incident, role of accused, weapons used and presence of witnesses. Cross-cases, hostile witnesses, doubtful recoveries and inconsistency with medical evidence created serious doubt. Trial Court’s view was a plausible one. Appeal dismissed; acquittal affirmed. |
| 9 |
CW / 15414 / 2025 (NARENDRA MAHALA S/O SHRI SURESH KUMAR MAHALA VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: 08/10/2025
Petitioner, a NEET-UG qualified candidate, sought condonation of a few hours’ delay in depositing balance MBBS fees due to death of his guardian & intervening holidays. His seat was treated vacant. HELD: Delay was bona fide; forfeiture of security deposit amounted to unjust enrichment. Procedural lapse which can be condoned should not defeat merit. No third-party rights are created. Pet. permitted to participate in Round-III counselling with adjustment of deposited amount; Petition allowed. |
