| 1 |
CRLR / 95 / 2025 (MITHU SINGH VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: 23/04/2025
Petitioner assailing the order passed by ld. Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities Cases), Chittorgarh, dismissing the application u/s 197(2) Cr.P.C. HELD: Pet. was not acting in the course of his official duties at the time of the alleged incident. The petitioner cannot invoke the protections of Sec. 197 Cr.P.C. solely by virtue of being a government employee, as the allegations made by the complainant are unrelated to the performance of his official duties. Petition dismissed. |
| 2 |
SAW / 566 / 2024 (ECOSAFE INFRAPROJECTS LLP VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: 22/04/2025
The appellant seeks quashing of the e-auction notice, alleging that its terms and conditions, particularly regarding lease commencement and sale price fixation, are vague, ambiguous, uncertain, and non-transparent. HELD- The Court held that the appellant’s doubts were unfounded and imaginary, as the rules governing the mining lease process were clear. The conditions in the e-auction notice were consistent with the Rules, and no ambiguity existed. The appeal, being sans substratum, was dismissed. |
| 3 |
CRLAS / 2507 / 2023 (DEEPAK LOHIYA VS NIRMALA DEVI JAIN) Date of Order/Judgment: 16/04/2025
Appellant challenged the acquittal of the respondent u/s 138 NI ACT. HELD: The Mere act of sending a notice does not fulfill the statutory obligation, but the notice must reach the accused. Any legally enforceable debt or liability must also be proved. The complainant failed to prove a valid cause of action. Appeal dismissed. |
| 4 |
CRLAS / 116 / 2024 (NIRMAL @ MOTA VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: 08/04/2025
Appellant assailing the judgment passed by the Additional District Judge No.1, Sriganganagar, convicting under section 7/25 of the Arms Act. HELD: To convict an accused under Section 7, concrete scientific evidence – such as report from a ballistic expert or a certified laboratory – must be produced to meet the criteria of a prohibited arms defined under Section 2 (1) (i). Appeal partly allowed. |
| 5 |
CRLMP / 1044 / 2025 (M/S CIRON DRUGS PHARMACEUTICALS PVT. LTD. VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: 20/03/2025
Petitioner seeks quashing of case No. 17/2023 pending before the Ld. CJM, Jalore. HELD: The prosecution is vitiated by inordinate delays with misapplication of statutory provisions, and lack of material evidence. The chronology of events establishes a clear violation of procedural safeguards. A careful examination of the allegations and test reports reveals that the drug in question does not meet any of the statutory definitions of “spurious” u/s 17B. Petition allowed. |
| 6 |
CW / 875 / 2016 (LIBRA INDIA VS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS) Date of Order/Judgment: 20/02/2025
The petitioner seeks the timely completion of Jodhpur Airport’s terminal, improved flight services, and enhanced aviation infrastructure for regional development. HELD- The Court held that poor aviation access in Jodhpur violates Article 21. Directed the State to act per Article 38, DPSP, to ensure infrastructure. Ordered completion of terminal by Oct 2025 to enable access to health, education, and growth, aligning with the petitioner’s plea |
| 7 |
CRLMP / 709 / 2013 (SMT.CHANDA DEVI AND ORS. VS STATE AND ANR.) Date of Order/Judgment: 07/02/2025
Petitioners sought quashing of the summoning order u/s 306 IPC. HELD- Before taking cognizance of the negative final report, reasons for disagreement with the final report is imperative. In case of alleged abetment of suicide, there must be proof of an actual act of investigation leading to the suicide; mere allegation of harassment doesn’t constitute an offence u/s 306 IPC. Petition allowed, proceedings quashed, accused exonerated. |
