CW / 5128 / 2026 (APOORVA AGRAWAT VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: 05/09/2026 The petitioner sought protection of Jawai leopard habitat and regulation of construction and tourism. HELD- As unrestricted construction could cause irreversible habitat damage and no comprehensive scientific policy existed, the Court adopted 1 km as an interim protective zone, supported by scientific material and the State’s existing policy. It was not permanent and could be revised after scientific assessment. Copy of judgment be circulated. All pending applications stand disposed of.
2
CW / 6350 / 2026 (DURGA SHANKAR ALIAS DURGESH VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: 01/09/2026 The petitioners sought quashing of orders directing sealing/demolition of constructions in the Sajjangarh Eco-Sensitive Zone. HELD- Deemed permission under general development law cannot override express environmental restrictions under the 13.02.2017 Notification and Zonal Master Plan. Precautionary principle and Public Trust Doctrine require environmental protection to prevail over private interest; investment or parity cannot legitimise unauthorised construction. Writ petitions dismissed.
3
CRLMB / 6014 / 2026 (NAND KISHORE VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: 25/08/2026 The petitioner sought bail under Section 483 BNSS, alleging that the night search without warrant violated Section 42 NDPS Act. HELD- A night search without warrant is permissible where the officer records reasons showing that delay may lead to escape or concealment and communicates the information as required. Here, prima facie compliance was shown. Since commercial quantity was recovered, Section 37 barred bail absent reasonable grounds of innocence; application dismissed.
4
CW / 20918 / 2026 (SMT. NIKITA VS RAJU SINGH) Date of Order/Judgment: 22/08/2026 Petitioners sought registration of a suit for permanent injunction, challenging valuation on market value as a declaratory suit merely because title by adverse possession was pleaded. HELD- Pleading accrued title by adverse possession does not itself constitute declaratory relief; the plaint must be read as a whole. Threshold scrutiny cannot become a mini-trial on title or adverse possession. Order quashed; plaint to be registered and injunction application considered. Writ petition allowed.
5
CW / 8961 / 2022 (BABU MOHAMMED PANWAR VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: 21/08/2026 Petitioner sought quashing of the charge-sheet under Rule 16 of the Rajasthan Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1958 and continuation of disciplinary proceedings after his death. HELD-Disciplinary proceedings, being personal to the delinquent, cannot continue after his death where no final penalty was imposed in his lifetime. Charge-sheet and consequential proceedings quashed; retiral benefits to be considered; pending applications disposed of.
1
CFA / 369 / 2019 (SMT GOMA DEVI W/O SHRI MANNA LAL D/O SHRI KANA VS LAXMI NARAIN SHARMA S/O SHRI GAINDI LAL SHARMA) Date of Order/Judgment: 07/09/2026 The appellant sought cancellation of the registered sale deed dated 16.04.2009 for non-payment of the full sale consideration. HELD- under Section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, non-payment of the entire consideration does not invalidate a completed registered sale where title was intended to pass; the seller’s remedy is recovery of unpaid consideration. Sale deed, possession and mutation supported transfer. Appeal dismissed
2
CRLMP / 4993 / 2023 (PRAMOD KUMAR SON OF SHRI MAHESH CHAND, VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: 02/09/2026 The Court addressed deficiencies in scanning and uploading case records that obstructed paperless hearings. HELD- Complete and timely digitization is essential for effective paperless justice; accountability must be fixed for scanning, bookmarking, indexing and uploading every document. The 02.11.2020 Standing Order, confined to criminal matters, required amendment to cover all jurisdictions. Registrar (Judicial) directed to place amended Standing Order before the Chief Justice.
3
CW / 11020 / 2026 (RAMLAXMAN MEENA S/O SHRI TEJA VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: 02/09/2026 The petitioner sought issuance of a No Dues/No Objection Certificate to contest the Panchayati Raj election despite dues recoverable from his wife. HELD- A spouse is not liable for the other’s dues without statutory authority or personal involvement. As the petitioner was neither surety nor guarantor and no law authorised recovery from family members, the certificate could not be withheld. Petition allowed; certificate to be issued forthwith. Pending applications disposed of.
4
CW / 17249 / 2026 (DWARKA PRASAD SON OF LATE SHRI SITARAM VS DURGALAL SON OF LATE SHRI SITARAM) Date of Order/Judgment: 02/09/2026 The petitioner sought setting aside of the order condoning delay in filing defendant No.3’s written statement under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC. HELD- In non-commercial suits, the timeline is directory and delay may be condoned on sufficient explanation assessed flexibly. Here, no ex parte order or forfeiture existed, proceedings were pending, and no substantial prejudice was caused. Trial Court’s order was lawful; writ petition dismissed.
5
CW / 16193 / 2026 (MANNI DEVI WIFE OF RAMPRASAD VS BHULI DEVI WIFE OF SHRI GANGARAM) Date of Order/Judgment: 01/09/2026 The petitioner sought quashing of the interim stay passed by the Revenue Appellate Authority and the consequential Board of Revenue order, contending that delay in the time-barred appeal had to be condoned first. HELD- Limitation goes to appellate jurisdiction; until delay is condoned, the appeal remains defective. Interim stay is permissible only in extreme and exceptional circumstances, absent here. Both orders quashed; the Authority directed to decide the Section 5 application first.
