CRLMP / 7662 / 2025 (DEEPAK ARORA VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: 07/02/2026 Petitioner sought quashing of FIR and consequential proceedings for offences under BNS and SC/ST Act arising out of alleged incident in Director’s office. HELD- even if FIR is taken at face value, incident within “four corners of the office” is not in “public views” mere presence of few employees is not public. Sec 3 (1) (r) & (s) not made out. Use of word “neech” is not caste-based and “mens rea” to humiliate is missing; continuation amounts to abuse of process of Court. FIR quashed.
2
CRLMP / 7453 / 2025 (MAHAVEER VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: 07/02/2026 Petitioner sought quashing of orders directing police & FSL to investigate the matter in a particular manner. HELD- though Court may direct further investigation u/Sec.173(8) CrPC, it cannot control manner of investigation or prescribe mode of collecting evidence, such power lies in exclusive domain of Investigating Agency, Court may monitor but not supervise. Such directions are unwarranted hence set aside to that extent. Petition partly allowed and pending applications disposed of.
3
CRLR / 103 / 2026 (SUMITRA VS ASHISH) Date of Order/Judgment: 04/02/2026 Accused sought quashing of appellate judgment setting aside conviction & remanding matter for fresh trial. HELD- appeal u/ proviso of Sec 372 CrPC not maintainable as it lies only against acquittal, lesser conviction or inadequate compensation grant of probation is part of sentencing. Appellate court committed fundamental jurisdictional error & made unwarranted assumption. Remand giving prosecution “2nd opportunity” is impermissible. Revision allowed, trial court’s judgment restored.
4
CW / 685 / 2005 (SUNIL KUMAR VS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.) Date of Order/Judgment: 02/02/2026 Petitioner sought quashing of punishment, appellate and revisional orders arising from departmental proceedings. HELD- Rule 28(b) of the CRPF Rules, 1955 bars appeal against punishment of censure; right of appeal is purely statutory and must be expressly provided. Entertaining such appeal was without jurisdiction; appellate and revisional proceedings stand vitiated, impugned orders quashed, original censure order survives, petition allowed and pending applications disposed of.
5
CRLW / 2358 / 2025 (PRADEEP KUMAR SARWOGI VS UNION OF INDIA) Date of Order/Judgment: 29/01/2026 Petitioner sought direction for renewal of passport despite pendency of criminal proceedings. HELD- Sec.6 (2) (f) of the Passports Act does not impose an absolute embargo on renewal merely due to pendency. Restriction is regulatory and purpose-oriented. Renewal is distinct from travel abroad. Insistence on prior NOC is procedural formalism unsupported by the statutory scheme, denial isn’t proportionate. Passport directed to be renewed, subject to court’s permission for travel.
1
CRLMB / 16064 / 2025 (VIVEK YADAV S/O MUKESH YADAV VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: 31/01/2026 Peti. sought grant of second bail after completion of investigation & filing of charge-sheet. HELD- at the stage of bail, detailed analysis of evidence is wholly impermissible and Court only examines “prima facie case”. Considering gravity, huge unauthorized transactions and multiple cyber complaints, grounds for bail not found, no change in circumstances; applications dismissed. Court also noted rising cybercrimes & need for strict measures, awareness & safeguards to protect public.
2
CW / 17462 / 2025 (SMT. SHABBO W/O SHRI ABDUL RAHIM VS M/S. SAJNI MEHNDI PRODUCT) Date of Order/Judgment: 27/01/2026 Petitioner sought quashing of orders passed Commercial Court rejecting application and deciding preliminary issue regarding effect of non-adherence of Sec.12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. HELD- while deciding application u/O.7 R.11 CPC, only the averments made in the plaint are to be considered and no amount of evidence can be looked into; issue is of law. Where suit contemplates urgent interim relief, Sec.12A is not attracted hence no interference called for. Writ petitions dismissed.
3
SOSA / 2204 / 2024 (RAJESH KUSHWAH S/O SHRI RAMSHAKAL KUSHWAH VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: 24/01/2026 The applicant sought recall of the condition requiring deposit of fine amount imposed while suspending sentence. HELD- imposing a condition impossible for a convict to comply with defeats the right of appeal and violates Art 21. Continued detention despite suspension of sentence was unjustified. The condition was recalled, release was directed forthwith, the application was allowed, and all pending applications stood disposed of as per law duly.
4
CR / 12 / 2023 (M/S ANONDITA HEALTHCARE, VS FAIZ MOHAMMAD S/O ABDUL RAHIM) Date of Order/Judgment: 24/01/2026 The petitioners sought setting aside of the order maintaining attachment of machines and rejection of objections under Section 47 CPC. HELD- executing court cannot travel beyond the decree or adjudicate matters not forming part of the decree, and doing so amounts to exercise of jurisdiction not vested in law and material irregularity. The objections were allowed, attachment set aside, machines directed to be released, and all pending applications stood disposed of in law duly.
5
CMA / 4843 / 2025 (M/S ANAMIKA CONDUCTORS PRIVATE LIMITED VS SE (MM) AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED) Date of Order/Judgment: 20/01/2026 The appellant sought setting aside of the order rejecting objections u/S 34 of the Arbitration Act as barred by limitation. HELD- objections must be filed within 3 months, extendable by only 30 days & limitation cannot be extended beyond 120 days. The Facilitation Council had unequivocally and with a unanimous decision that proceedings before the Settlement Committee were independent and had no bearing on limitation. The appeals were dismissed and all pending applications stood disposed of.
